Comments on: Linking and Backlinking http://www.justinparks.com/linking-backlinking/ For Marketing and Social Media stuff Sat, 11 Feb 2012 10:06:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Misunderstanding SEO | Social Media Stuff | Justin Parkshttp://www.justinparks.com/linking-backlinking/#comment-239 Misunderstanding SEO | Social Media Stuff | Justin Parks Fri, 29 May 2009 09:49:33 +0000 http://www.justinparks.com/?p=623#comment-239 [...] 1: SEO Services and SEO Budgets Post 2: SEO and Keyword Density Post 3: Linking and Backlinking Post 4: Writing content for your Visitor Post 5: Is W3C validation worthwhile? Post 6: Permalinks [...] [...] 1: SEO Services and SEO Budgets Post 2: SEO and Keyword Density Post 3: Linking and Backlinking Post 4: Writing content for your Visitor Post 5: Is W3C validation worthwhile? Post 6: Permalinks [...]

]]> By: Justin Parkshttp://www.justinparks.com/linking-backlinking/#comment-238 Justin Parks Wed, 11 Mar 2009 19:37:45 +0000 http://www.justinparks.com/?p=623#comment-238 Hi Graham, its something I have thought about myself, it surely must be a practice employed by the more "unethical" types about. Its also one of the reasons that multi linking "easy" links makes it so much harder to stop as you tend to loose control of where the links originate. Bearing this in mind, there are large sites out there who have people linking to them all over the place and im sure they cannot possibly monitor or control all these links and it certainly doesnt seem to do them any harm. I guess it all boils down to what Google define as a "bad neighbourhood" rather than a bad site. I am actually looking into this at the moment and if you keep an eye on the site there should be an post about it soon. Hi Graham, its something I have thought about myself, it surely must be a practice employed by the more “unethical” types about. Its also one of the reasons that multi linking “easy” links makes it so much harder to stop as you tend to loose control of where the links originate. Bearing this in mind, there are large sites out there who have people linking to them all over the place and im sure they cannot possibly monitor or control all these links and it certainly doesnt seem to do them any harm.

I guess it all boils down to what Google define as a “bad neighbourhood” rather than a bad site.

I am actually looking into this at the moment and if you keep an eye on the site there should be an post about it soon.

]]> By: Justin Parkshttp://www.justinparks.com/linking-backlinking/#comment-243 Justin Parks Wed, 11 Mar 2009 19:37:00 +0000 http://www.justinparks.com/?p=623#comment-243 Hi Graham, its something I have thought about myself, it surely must be a practice employed by the more "unethical" types about. Its also one of the reasons that multi linking "easy" links makes it so much harder to stop as you tend to loose control of where the links originate. Bearing this in mind, there are large sites out there who have people linking to them all over the place and im sure they cannot possibly monitor or control all these links and it certainly doesnt seem to do them any harm. I guess it all boils down to what Google define as a "bad neighbourhood" rather than a bad site. I am actually looking into this at the moment and if you keep an eye on the site there should be an post about it soon. Hi Graham, its something I have thought about myself, it surely must be a practice employed by the more “unethical” types about. Its also one of the reasons that multi linking “easy” links makes it so much harder to stop as you tend to loose control of where the links originate. Bearing this in mind, there are large sites out there who have people linking to them all over the place and im sure they cannot possibly monitor or control all these links and it certainly doesnt seem to do them any harm.

I guess it all boils down to what Google define as a “bad neighbourhood” rather than a bad site.

I am actually looking into this at the moment and if you keep an eye on the site there should be an post about it soon.

]]> By: Rob Barhamhttp://www.justinparks.com/linking-backlinking/#comment-237 Rob Barham Wed, 11 Mar 2009 19:26:41 +0000 http://www.justinparks.com/?p=623#comment-237 Hola Justin, Just thinking as I read your explanation about the "bad neighbour" or link from the "local hustler" as you put it... Never thought of this before but as it's a lot easier to get some crap links than good links couldn't a firm that wanted to get ahead of a competitor in SE rankings just arrange for the competitor to get some spammy links and wait for a penalty to take effect. . . . . Does this go on ? Hola Justin,
Just thinking as I read your explanation about the “bad neighbour” or link from the “local hustler” as you put it… Never thought of this before but as it’s a lot easier to get some crap links than good links couldn’t a firm that wanted to get ahead of a competitor in SE rankings just arrange for the competitor to get some spammy links and wait for a penalty to take effect. . . . . Does this go on ?

]]> By: Rob Barhamhttp://www.justinparks.com/linking-backlinking/#comment-242 Rob Barham Wed, 11 Mar 2009 19:26:00 +0000 http://www.justinparks.com/?p=623#comment-242 Hola Justin, Just thinking as I read your explanation about the "bad neighbour" or link from the "local hustler" as you put it... Never thought of this before but as it's a lot easier to get some crap links than good links couldn't a firm that wanted to get ahead of a competitor in SE rankings just arrange for the competitor to get some spammy links and wait for a penalty to take effect. . . . . Does this go on ? Hola Justin,
Just thinking as I read your explanation about the “bad neighbour” or link from the “local hustler” as you put it… Never thought of this before but as it’s a lot easier to get some crap links than good links couldn’t a firm that wanted to get ahead of a competitor in SE rankings just arrange for the competitor to get some spammy links and wait for a penalty to take effect. . . . . Does this go on ?

]]> By: Justin Parkshttp://www.justinparks.com/linking-backlinking/#comment-236 Justin Parks Wed, 04 Mar 2009 18:07:05 +0000 http://www.justinparks.com/?p=623#comment-236 All depends Graham. "No Follow" means that NONE of the Page Rank of that specific page gets passed via the link to the end site/page. "Do Follow" links allows some of that Page Rank to "seep" through to the end page, adding value to the link and helping the end page become more important. From what you have said you had a site that allowed some of your PR to seep, now it doesn't so the sites it was linking to will loose some benefit. The Links that you have pointing or leading to your site will all be dependant on the source site allowing follow or no follow, thats not something that you can affect...it all depends on their policy... if you follow me. Take this comment for example. I have DO FOLLOW. You will get some PR from this page and the backlink. <strong>Bonus.</strong> Most sites will only give the Backlink, and not necessarily the PR. Does this make sense? All depends Graham.

“No Follow” means that NONE of the Page Rank of that specific page gets passed via the link to the end site/page.

“Do Follow” links allows some of that Page Rank to “seep” through to the end page, adding value to the link and helping the end page become more important.

From what you have said you had a site that allowed some of your PR to seep, now it doesn’t so the sites it was linking to will loose some benefit.

The Links that you have pointing or leading to your site will all be dependant on the source site allowing follow or no follow, thats not something that you can affect…it all depends on their policy… if you follow me.

Take this comment for example. I have DO FOLLOW. You will get some PR from this page and the backlink.

Bonus.

Most sites will only give the Backlink, and not necessarily the PR.

Does this make sense?

]]> By: Justin Parkshttp://www.justinparks.com/linking-backlinking/#comment-241 Justin Parks Wed, 04 Mar 2009 18:07:00 +0000 http://www.justinparks.com/?p=623#comment-241 All depends Graham. "No Follow" means that NONE of the Page Rank of that specific page gets passed via the link to the end site/page. "Do Follow" links allows some of that Page Rank to "seep" through to the end page, adding value to the link and helping the end page become more important. From what you have said you had a site that allowed some of your PR to seep, now it doesn't so the sites it was linking to will loose some benefit. The Links that you have pointing or leading to your site will all be dependant on the source site allowing follow or no follow, thats not something that you can affect...it all depends on their policy... if you follow me. Take this comment for example. I have DO FOLLOW. You will get some PR from this page and the backlink. <strong>Bonus.</strong> Most sites will only give the Backlink, and not necessarily the PR. Does this make sense? All depends Graham.

“No Follow” means that NONE of the Page Rank of that specific page gets passed via the link to the end site/page.

“Do Follow” links allows some of that Page Rank to “seep” through to the end page, adding value to the link and helping the end page become more important.

From what you have said you had a site that allowed some of your PR to seep, now it doesn’t so the sites it was linking to will loose some benefit.

The Links that you have pointing or leading to your site will all be dependant on the source site allowing follow or no follow, thats not something that you can affect…it all depends on their policy… if you follow me.

Take this comment for example. I have DO FOLLOW. You will get some PR from this page and the backlink.

Bonus.

Most sites will only give the Backlink, and not necessarily the PR.

Does this make sense?

]]> By: Grahamhttp://www.justinparks.com/linking-backlinking/#comment-235 Graham Wed, 04 Mar 2009 16:05:26 +0000 http://www.justinparks.com/?p=623#comment-235 So do you reckon that backlinks that are follow links are more useful than nofollow links Justin? One of the sites that I had loads of links has just gone nofollow and all of my content backdated now has those type of links. Any opinions? So do you reckon that backlinks that are follow links are more useful than nofollow links Justin? One of the sites that I had loads of links has just gone nofollow and all of my content backdated now has those type of links. Any opinions?

]]> By: grahunthttp://www.justinparks.com/linking-backlinking/#comment-240 grahunt Wed, 04 Mar 2009 16:05:00 +0000 http://www.justinparks.com/?p=623#comment-240 So do you reckon that backlinks that are follow links are more useful than nofollow links Justin? One of the sites that I had loads of links has just gone nofollow and all of my content backdated now has those type of links. Any opinions? So do you reckon that backlinks that are follow links are more useful than nofollow links Justin? One of the sites that I had loads of links has just gone nofollow and all of my content backdated now has those type of links. Any opinions?

]]>